Menu

Money

Greatest hardtop sports cars of all time are honored

Jaguar design director explains his choice of a 1961 Aston Martin for greatest hardtop sports car of all time: British engineering and Italian styling(Photo: Chris Woodyard/USA TODAY) AutoplayShow ThumbnailsShow CaptionsLast SlideNext Slide[1][2]LOS ANGELES -- It's an odd assortment -- from a 1948 Jaguar Custom "Black Pearl" to a 1991 Acura NSX -- but they have one thing in common: they've been deemed the most beautiful hardtop sports cars of all time.A cocktail party launched the exhibition at the Petersen Automotive Museum here last week, with a few of the "celebrity curators" on hand to explain -- or defend -- their choices.For instance, Jaguar designer Ian Callum chose a 1961 Aston Martin DB4 Zagato, which he called the best of Italian style and British engineering. He says he knew he'd get ribbed about the "British engineering" part, but heck, they were good cars.And Motor Trend Editor-At-Large Angus McKenzie says the NSX, his choice, was the sports car that forced all others to improve. At the time, it was a sensation in terms of its handling, balance and all the things that make sports cars stand out.The exhibition is being sponsored by Jaguar as a way of launching its new F-Type hardtop sports car. One is tucked away in the corner, as if trying to decide whether it can hold its own against the famous beauties around it."We are proud to be involved with an exhibit that celebrates game-changing coupes," said Jeff Curry, brand vice president for Jaguar, in a statement. "One of the great things about being a car lover is that we can all have our own point of view on what makes a sports coupe deserving to be part of the 'World's Greatest.'"Besides the Aston and the NSX, the exhibition includes:-- 1948 Jaguar Custom "Black Pearl" chosen by Metallica's…
Read more...

Do you own stock? You're getting a 23% raise

The soaring stock market isn’t the only good news for investors. Dividends are set to jump by a double-digit percentage from 2013′s already record level. The bottom line is that investors can expect a nice raise, to the tune of 22.9% over the dividend payout increase in the same period a year ago, says Howard Silverblatt of S&P Dow Jones Indices. Net increases to dividends (dividend hikes minus dividend cuts) are $17.8 billion for U.S. stock, versus a $14.5 billion increase in the first quarter of 2013, Silverblatt says. Flush with record profit and record piles of cash, companies are boosting dividends faster than even during the boom of the late 1970s. Nearly 1,078 dividend increases have been reported during the first quarter of 2014, the biggest quarter ever for increases. The number of dividend increases even tops the number of boosts in the first quarter of 1979, 1069, which has stood as a long-standing record. Source: Howard Silverblatt, S&P Dow Jones Indices, USA TODAY research via Microsoft Excel All this means that for investors looking for income, or at least some extra money, dividends are a tough game to beat. The weighted-average dividend yield of the Standard & Poor’s 500 is now 2.48%, up from 2.44% at the end of the first quarter of 2013. That makes dividends one of the best sources of income going amid the perpetual low-interest rate world we live in. Dividend payments are expected to rise 15% in the first quarter of 2014 from the first quarter of 2013. If there’s a risk to dividends, it’s the rise of initial public offerings of companies that don’t pay dividends. The percentage of companies paying dividends fell a bit to 47% in the first quarter from 47.7% in the fourth quarter. But still, it’s an undeniable…
Read more...

World Wrestling gets Wall Street style take down

Gary Strauss, USA TODAY 4:21 p.m. EDT April 7, 2014 Hulk Hogan flexes and poses at the WrestleMania 30 news conference.(Photo: Dimitrios Kambouris, Getty Images)Holy Hulkamania. Wall Street is hammering World Wrestling Entertainment.Shares of the sports entertainment company plunged $4.12 to $23.90 in heavyweight trading Monday - a dive only pro wrestler The Undertaker might appreciate.Behind the 15% downdraft, a bounce back from an intraday 22% slide: Word that 667,000 fans had signed up for WWE Network, the $9.99 monthly subscription service launched Feb. 24.WWE says it's well on its way towards a year-end goal of 1 million subscribers. Still, some stockholders found the 42-day count underwhelming and unloaded shares a day after the company's signature event, WrestleMania 30, at which The Undertaker's 21-match winning streak ended before a packed Mercedes-Benz Superdome in New Orleans.One of Wall Street's biggest Monday losers had been on a roll for much of the past year, surging from $8.56 to $31.98 by last month on prospects for WWE Network, the Internet streaming service which augments ending distribution agreements with several broadcast and cable TV networks. (WWE also has a new deal with Britain's BSKB network).The faux sport, which turned Hulk Hogan, The Rock, John Cena and even WWE CEO Vince McMahon into very real cross-over film and entertainment stars, continues to have a wide following. According to company filings, 256 live North American events in 2013 attracted more than 1.5 million fans, another 382,000 at 56 events overseas.WWE conceded in its annual statement that it lacks expertise in its subscription model and "could experience significant setbacks" monetizing the service. The company posted a fourth-quarter operating loss of $12.2 million, compared to income of $2.6 million in the year-ago quarter, due mostly to investments in WWE Network.Among Wall Street stock analysts, at least two have…
Read more...

Should you bother itemizing your tax returns?

Bloomberg Photo Service 'Best of the Week': U.S. Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service (IRS) 1040 Individual Income Tax forms for the 2013 tax year are arranged for a photograph in Tiskilwa, Illinois, U.S., on Tuesday, Feb. 25, 2014. For a plan unlikely to become law anytime soon, Representative Dave Camp's proposal to revamp the tax code is causing a lot of agitation among U.S. companies. Photographer: Daniel Acker/Bloomberg ORG XMIT: 476064993(Photo: Daniel Acker Bloomberg)Getting your paperwork together before Tax Day? Well, before you break out the calculator and dig through shoe boxes of receipts, keep in mind these are futile exercises for many Americans."Most people who file, roughly two-third take the standard deduction instead of itemizing," said Chris Woehrle, assistant professor of taxation at The American College of Financial Services.The standard deduction is a fixed amount that the Internal Revenue Service will knock off your taxes with no questions asked.For tax year 2013, the standard deduction is $6,100 if you're single or filing separately from your spouse. The standard deduction for those married and filing jointly is $12,200.If you have deductions (supported with proper documentation, of course) that top these amounts, then it makes sense to itemize your return.But if not, you're simply wasting your time crunching numbers that won't get you a bigger refund."The general public, I believe, has the correct assumption that the tax code is complicated," said Woehrle, citing estimates that the U.S. tax code is some 70,000 pages long. "Most people assume there's something in there for me that's going to reduce my taxes. But it's not always true."Streamline the Tax ProcessIf you don't own property or a business, it's unlikely that you'll qualify for some of the juiciest deductions.Similarly, a relatively small percentage of Americans have investments outside of a qualified retirement plan…
Read more...

Is 1987-type market crash 37 trading days away?

Investors marveling at the striking similarities of the bull market today to the one that ended in 1987 are hoping history doesn’t repeat itself. If it does, the market could be in some serious trouble in 37 trading days. In 37 trading days, the ongoing bull market would be 1,311 trading days old, says Jim Paulsen of Wells Capital Management. That is a scary date because it was on the 1,311 trading day after the start of the 1982 bull market that the Standard & Poor’s 500 suffered its biggest one-day crash in history on Oct. 19, 1987. That crash snuffed out what had been a powerful market rally starting in 1982. Normally these kinds of things are just market oddities. But investors are taking this one seriously since there are such strong similarities with the 1982 bull market and the one the market is currently in. For instance, the current bull run has marked a 175% rally from the low, which is where the 1982 bull was at this point in its run, Paulsen says. Investors won’t have to wait long to know if the 1987 market is a pattern. The current bull run hit its 1,274th trading day on March 31, 2014. The 1,274th trading day of the 1982 bull market was Aug. 25, 1987, which turned out to be a notable top, Paulsen says. 1987 had its own unique issues not present today. Prime rates were at 21% and the oil cartel had a grip on the economy, Paulsen says. That’s not to say a crash is inevitable. Paulsen says that a 10% correction would be more likely than a full blown crash. And stocks might even rise first. And the market is famous for not following any patterns at all. “Don’t worry much, however, about another…
Read more...

Apple and Samsung head to court again

Martha Mendoza, AP Business Writer 12:58 p.m. EDT March 30, 2014 The Apple iPhone 4s, left, is displayed next to the Samsung Galaxy S III at a store in San Francisco.(Photo: Marcio Jose Sanchez AP)SAN JOSE, Calif. (AP) — The fiercest rivalry in the world of smartphones is heading back to court this week in the heart of the Silicon Valley, with Apple and Samsung accusing each other, once again, of ripping off designs and features.The trial will mark the latest round in a long-running series of lawsuits between the two tech giants that underscore a much larger concern about what is allowed to be patented."There's a widespread suspicion that lots of the kinds of software patents at issue are written in ways that cover more ground than what Apple or any other tech firm actually invented," Notre Dame law professor Mark McKenna said. "Overly broad patents allow companies to block competition."The latest Apple-Samsung case will be tried less than two years after a federal jury found Samsung was infringing on Apple patents. Samsung was ordered to pay about $900 million but is appealing and has been allowed to continue selling products using the technology.Now, jury selection is scheduled to begin Monday in another round of litigation, with Apple accusing Samsung of infringing on five patents on newer devices, including Galaxy smartphones and tablets. In a counterclaim, Samsung says Apple stole two of its ideas to use on iPhones and iPads."Apple revolutionized the market in personal computing devices," Apple attorneys wrote in court filings. "Samsung, in contrast, has systematically copied Apple's innovative technology and products, features and designs, and has deluged markets with infringing devices."Samsung countered that it has broken technological barriers with its own ultra-slim, lightweight phones."Samsung has been a pioneer in the mobile device business sector since the…
Read more...
Subscribe to this RSS feed