A Paralympic legacy

Above: Sainsbury’s, which sponsored the Paralympic Games, has also partnered with British Athletics to run the Anniversary Games

Nearly 12 million people in the UK have a disability, according to the Government’s Family Resources Survey. That equates to 19 per cent of the population, or just under one in five.

Looking around, that statistic might seem surprisingly high. According to Tom Hall, director of corporate partnerships at disability charity Scope, that is because people with disabilities remain largely sidelined from the high street as their consumer needs are often not met. “It is always a bit of an eye-opener when we take potential supporters to visit some of our services because they just don’t tend to see disabled people out and about,” he says.

Brands’ failure to address the needs of disabled consumers could be costly, given that the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills estimates that their combined spending could be worth over £80bn annually. But Hall argues that marketers too often view the adjustments brands need to make to attract their business as a burden of legal compliance, rather than as an improvement in the customer journey that could have real commercial benefits.

Since the Paralympics took place in August and September 2012, there have been plenty of positive developments around brands’ inclusivity of disabled people and according to the Office for National Statistics (ONS), more than half the population says their perception of disability improved as a result of the event. Official broadcaster Channel 4 and sponsor Sainsbury’s both extended their parasport commitments to this summer’s Anniversary Games, while retailers Debenhams and Marks & Spencer have both included disabled actors and models in their marketing in the past year.^[1][2][3]

We want to show a realistic image to customers, which they are able to relate to. Using models with disabilities is just part of that commitment

Yet according to the ONS, in the past 12 months 41 per cent of disabled people have had difficulty accessing some kind of leisure activity, including 23 per cent who have been deterred from shopping, 21 per cent from going to the cinema, the theatre or a concert and 18 per cent from going to restaurants (See ‘Hard to Swallow’, below)^[4] . A short trip down shopping mecca Oxford Street in London indicates that despite increasingly positive perceptions of disability in the UK, facilities and shops are slow to change.

Marketing Week examined a 300-metre stretch of Europe’s busiest shopping street that boasts 20 separate storefronts. Even though they include some brands’ national flagship stores, the results are not encouraging for shoppers with mobility problems. Only 11 of the 20 shops that Marketing Week visited have step- and escalator-free access to all areas (see ‘Restricted Access’, below)^[5] .

The results would perhaps be even worse if more nuanced aspects of the shopper experience were included, such as the size of fitting rooms or consumers’ ability to reach products on racks and shelves. Even getting to Oxford Street would be a challenge for most wheelchair users, since the nearest accessible London Underground station is Green Park, nearly a mile away.

Footwear retailer Schuh – whose Oxford Street store does have a customer lift, but one that Marketing Week found is not clearly signed – points out that a number of difficulties may thwart brands’ good intentions. The company claims it makes “every effort” to accommodate customers with disabilities, but its spokesperson suggests creative approaches are sometimes required.

“Our older, multi-floored stores may not have lift access as many are listed buildings, making renovation for this difficult, however within these stores provisions have been made for customers with disabilities. We have in-store kiosks that can be used to browse the entire Schuh range, and when the customer has selected their shoes a member of staff will bring them to wherever is most convenient for them.”

However, serving the UK’s 12 million disabled consumers is not only about providing wheelchair access; just 900,000 people in England and Wales use them. Other impairments can range from blindness to communication problems, as well as cognitive disorders that affect learning, concentration or memory.

Office manager at accessible boating company Wetwheels, Angus McKechnie, who has cerebral palsy, says he is often disadvantaged by the service at coffee shops: “I don’t always get help carrying the tray when I need it most. It seems that quite often, staff are trained to be more of a production line than to offer customer service.”

Indeed, many of the adjustments brands could make to ensure their products, services and marketing do not exclude people with impairments would be far simpler and cheaper to achieve than installing lifts in stores, and would have just as profound an impact. Many could also be fairly easily built into research and design processes at the start of the product cycle, as Scope’s Hall explains.

“Accessibility can be simple things like making sure people can read your signage. There are lots of elements to accessibility that companies could work on, which could be excluding certain customers. One of the best ways for firms to do that would be to do product or customer journey testing with disabled customers.”

An example of an unnecessary barrier that could easily be removed with a bit of planning are enquiry or payment desks that are placed too high, he says. But brands could also make more effort to create products that are desirable and usable for both disabled and non-disabled people, thus reaching another 12 million potential consumers – 20 million if you include disabled people’s family members, who often buy products on their behalf, according to Scope.

“Topshop could, for example, be working with a disabled designer to design clothes that work for people in wheelchairs. They could steal a march on other clothes designers and high street retailers that don’t think of those people as a target market,” says Hall.

At Channel 4, chief marketing officer Dan Brooke echoes Hall’s comments, claiming that companies would be better able to reach disabled consumers if disabled employees had a central role in product strategy. Channel 4 was official UK broadcaster of the Paralympics and has since committed to showing three high-profile parasport events this summer. It has also commissioned several other disability-related programmes such as comedy show The Last Leg and documentary The Undateables, which follows disabled people who sign up to a specialist dating service.

Brooke says: “We found that during the Paralympics, all the things that went well, whether they were the real-life events or the broadcasts, were always better when disabled people were centrally involved. I think [Paralympics organising committee] Locog would say the same thing.

“In the world of business, a big part of replicating that would be encouraging employers to look at disabled people as a rich source of talent, in a way that perhaps hasn’t existed in the past.”

Brooke believes that the Paralympics has created fundamental change in the way disabled people are both perceived and treated in UK society generally, although he acknowledges that such changes are, by nature, slow to happen. Statistics produced by the ONS between 2005 and 2011 suggest improvements were made in that time regarding overall access to goods and services, but the pace of change was sluggish and relatively high proportions of people still report difficulties obtaining them.

It is also likely that much of the improvement is a result of increased availability of online commerce. However, relying solely on the internet to boost disabled consumers’ access to brands’ offerings would be unwise. ONS data shows nearly a third of disabled adults have never used the internet, compared to 9 per cent of non-disabled adults.

Furthermore, Wetwheels’ McKechnie argues that many websites are not fully accessible: “Even though there are rules governing it, I am still surprised that a number of websites aren’t adapted so disabled people can extract information from them, almost in some cases barring them from their online [services].”

Sainsbury’s marketing director Sarah Warby likens brands’ efforts to adapt their offerings for disabled consumers to “painting the Forth Bridge” - a job that never ends.

“Of course you go through the [legal] compliance and get all the basics right, but it’s really important for us that we don’t stand still. There’s always more to do – there’s always a ramp somewhere that’s missing or a sign that isn’t legible enough. There’s always something to improve.”

One aspect of marketing to disabled people that Warby, Channel 4’s Brooke and Scope’s Hall all agree on is that more portrayals of disabled people in advertising and the media are needed. It is difficult to measure progress in this area, since none of the advertising industry bodies that Marketing Week contacted – ISBA, the IPA, the AA and WARC – hold any data against which to set a benchmark.

Nonetheless, Brooke argues that despite Channel 4’s focus on bringing disability from the margins into the mainstream, there is a dearth of representation on television: “In the process of appealing to wide audiences, one of the ways to do that is by reflecting society, and it’s not that you would think disabled people don’t exist by watching a night’s worth of TV across all the channels, but they are not 10 to 20 per cent of people on TV even though that is true in the wider world.”

Warby at Sainsbury’s acknowledges that it can be difficult to get the tone right when pushing for increased representation of disability. Marketers can be accused of tokenism or being patronising, she says. When Channel 4 announced its first series of The Undateables in 2012, the programme’s title was heavily criticised by newspapers and Twitter users, but the show has been recommissioned for a third series, after peaking with 4 million viewers.

Prominent advertisers have also used disabled models and actors in their marketing in the past year. Marks & Spencer featured four-year-old Seb White, who has Down’s Syndrome, in its 2012 Christmas TV ad while Debenhams employed Paralympian Stefanie Reid to model its spring/summer 2013 collection in April.

Senior PR manager at Debenhams, Michelle Dowdall, says: “We want to show a realistic image to our customers, which they are able to relate to. Using models with disabilities is simply a part of this commitment. We hope that our inclusivity campaigns will encourage the rest of the high street to sit up and take note, and hopefully attitudes will change and we will see more difference in the future.”

However, as with the adjustments brands can make to their products and services, even incidental changes in their marketing communications could have substantial positive effects while entailing little commercial risk. Marketers do not need to position their offerings especially for disabled people at the expense of the mass market, says Scope’s Hall; they could simply make more effort not to exclude them.

“If something is targeted around disability, it can often be positioned negatively, rather than showing a disabled person achieving their potential. But you can imagine having Paralympians in advertising where the disability is not relevant. That’s what we would encourage brands to think of doing – just as with taking a diversity approach within advertising along racial lines.

“It would say a lot for the brand, for example, if a supermarket, rather than featuring a disabled person as a lead character in an advert, had people in the background who happen to be disabled and it’s noticeable that they’re in the store just shopping.”

Marketers perhaps believe that making their brands more accessible to disabled people means creating specialist products or carrying out costly building works. But rather than seeing disabled people as a narrow niche, there is an opportunity to view this diverse group as a segment of the mass market that is at present under-served, but which can easily be included through giving more attention to the customer journey.

Ultimately, even though perceptions of disability are more positive than before the Paralympics, many marketers appear not to have appreciated one of the key messages that UK society in general has taken out of the Games. As Sainsbury’s Warby points out, neither people nor brands will do any harm by “being honest and trying to do the right thing”.

And if there’s any uncertainty about what disabled consumers want, she offers a simple solution: “If you don’t know, just ask.”

References

1. ^{^} Sainsbury’s (www.marketingweek.co.uk)
2. ^{^} Marks & Spencer (www.marketingweek.co.uk)
3. ^{^} in their marketing in the past year. (www.marketingweek.co.uk)
4. ^{^} (See ‘Hard to Swallow’, below) (www.marketingweek.co.uk)
5. ^{^} (see ‘Restricted Access’, below) (www.marketingweek.co.uk)
6. ^{^} Back to the top (www.marketingweek.co.uk)
7. ^{^} Back to the top (www.marketingweek.co.uk)